Orly Taitz and her merry band of zealots have been beaten down (again) by the court system. U.S. District Judge David O. Carter has dismissed Barnett et al v. Obama et al, the latest in Taitz's attempts to 'overthrow the ursurper', President Obama. Here is the entire ruling. Here is the disposition:
Too good not to post. Now, back to being sick.
Interpreting the Constitution is a serious and crucial task with which the federal courts of this nation have been entrusted under Article III. However, that very same Constitution puts limits on the reach of the federal courts. One of those limits is that the Constitution defines processes through which the President can be removed from office. The Constitution does not include a role for the Court in that process. Plaintiffs have encouraged the Court to ignore these mandates of the Constitution; to disregard the limits on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by We the People‚ sixty-nine million of the people. Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism. Therefore, for the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.
Head nod: David Weigel
Want more? RSS FEED | TWITTER FEED | FACEBOOK | STORE | HOME
The Pajama Pundit - Founder/Editor
