Apparently, the DNC is in the process of debating whether or not to keep Supers in the primary election process:One year after the country got an in-depth lesson on "superdelegates," the Democratic Party may consider doing away with them in the future.
I say get rid of 'em. It seems to me to be a unnecessary step in the process.
It was just over one year ago when Barack Obama accumulated more delegates than Hillary Clinton, causing the former first lady to end her historic campaign to become the Democratic presidential nominee.
But there is no rest for the weary.
The lengthy, expensive, and often divisive 2008 Democratic nominating process caused the launch of a Democratic National Committee review of how to tweak the primary and caucus process to avoid some of the pitfalls exposed in the Obama vs. Clinton battle royale last year.
Like what you see? RSS FEED | TWITTER FEED | HOME
02 July 2009
Remember The Superdelegates?
This space is designed for thoughtful commentary on politics and media (and whatever else comes to mind). The Pajama Pundit welcomes people from all political stripes to voice opinions freely and without fear of mean-spirited attacks. He does however expect intelligent discussion -- and some understanding of proper grammar usage.
For a more detailed look at commenting, please review our Comment Policy.
Please refrain from personal attacks on authors or other users. Back up your argument with documentation (links to elsewhere on the web). This is a big sandbox -- so please play nicely with one another.
NOTE: For all of the HTML nerds out there (like me), anchor, strong (bold), em (italic) and blockquote tags work within the comment form.
















The Pajama Pundit - Founder/Editor

