Awwwwwww how sweet is this? From the AP -
OMAHA, Neb. — Physician LeRoy Carhart wants to continue providing third-term abortions after the brazen slaying of his friend and colleague George Tiller, but the Nebraska doctor doesn't have anywhere to perform them — and he's one of only a handful of providers who will. "Dr. Tiller and I and all our friends know that tomorrow is never a given," Carhart told The Associated Press. "I think what we have to do is not let this loss of his life affect our goals in life, No. 1, and we need to do things so he's never forgotten."Now I dont know about you...but I can think of no better tribute to a deceased person than killing new life. I mean, how awesome is that that this "doctor" is so committed to the cause of killing babies past their 22nd week of pregnancy (sarcasm). "Our goals in life"...your goals of killing babies in the third trimesters in the name of "choice"? Disgusting.
According to the AP - only about 10 doctors will perform these procedures...10 DOCTORS! What does that say about this procedure? Now...I know...the law doesn't forbid these nutjobs from performing this heinous act on new human life...but doesn't anyone think it's kind of crazy these guys are so set on performing this act? That maybe 10 doctors in all of the United States will perform it...no other doctors will...that should tell us something as a society.
I am praying for the near 60,000 babies that Dr. Tiller killed during his life on this planet. That, my friends, is a tragedy.
Like what you see? RSS FEED TWITTER FEED HOME
The Pajama Pundit - Founder/Editor
15 comments:
Add to your prayer list that the next terrorist attack/hit-job is more effective. This last one obviously didn't finish the job of deterring late-term abortions.
Please request rain for the uppper midwest too. It's dry up here.
Have you bothered at all to read any of the stories about the mothers that used these abortions at all? Here is one you might want to check out.
"As we sat there, she said that the ultrasound indicated that the fetus had an open neural tube defect, meaning that the spinal column had not closed properly. It was a term I remembered skipping right over in my pregnancy book, along with all the other fetal anomalies and birth defects that I thought referred to other people's babies, not mine. She couldn't tell us much more. We would have to go to the main hospital in Boston, which had a more high-tech machine and a more highly trained technician. She tried to be hopeful -- there was a wide range of severity with these defects, she said. And then she left us to cry."
"I don't know what was worse, those three days leading up to the procedure (I have never called it an abortion) or every day since. I clung to Dave. He was always the rock in our relationship, but I now became completely dependent on him for my own sanity. Though abortion had never been part of his consciousness, he was resolved in a way that my hormones or female nature or whatever wouldn't let me be. But I worried about him, too. The only time I saw him crack was after his brother -- his best friend -- left a tearful message on our answering machine. Then I found Dave kneeling on the floor in our bathroom, doubled over and bawling, his body quaking. That nearly killed me.
I don't remember much from those three days. Walking around with a belly full of broken dreams, it felt like what I would imagine drowning feels like -- flailing and suffocating and desperate. Semiconscious. Surrounded by our family, I found myself tortured by our decision, asking over and over, are we doing the right thing? That was the hardest part. Even though I finally understood that pregnancy wasn't a Gerber commercial, that bringing forth life was intimately wrapped up in death -- what with miscarriage and stillbirth -- this was actually a choice. Everyone said, of course it's the right thing to do -- even my Catholic father and my Republican father-in-law, neither of whom was ever "pro-choice." Because suddenly, for them, it wasn't about religious doctrine or political platforms. It was personal -- their son, their daughter, their grandchild. It was flesh and blood, as opposed to abstract ideology, and that changed everything."
Women who opt for this horriable procedure are not women who have gotten into this irresponsiably. It's women like these...
"the pregnant woman who was diagnosed with metastic melanoma and needed immediate chemotherapy, the woman who was carrying conjoined twins that had only one set of lungs and one heart, the woman whose baby had a three-chambered heart and would never live."
I agree with you to a point, Diddy. But the bottom line is its not illegal. Stop being so damned cold hearted and say a pray for the guy who was ILLEGALLY killed during a church service.
Is doing these late term abortions disgusting and appalling, of course it is. But he didn't do anything illegal.
Anyone who thinks the guy who killed Tiller did a good thing needs to show me where Jesus ever talked about killing people who you disagree with.
Late term abortions are also highly regulated. You can't just pop into a clinic and have one just because you feel like it.
Here is the Kansas Statue regarding abortion.
I'm probably the only conservative/libertarian who is pro-choice.
p.s. I wouldn't call this murder a terrorist act. Anyone who believes so is... well I'll leave it at that.
S: (n) terrorism, act of terrorism, terrorist act (the calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear)
I don't know Fury, it seems to fit the defintion fairly well.
You really don't need to link me the definition. It really isn't terrorism. That's reading WAY too far into it.
So what would you call it? A revenge killing?
Hey Vast, what's the Christian word for "jihad?"
Crusade, but that doesn't fit here.
Regardless of what we want to call it, and I'll admit that terrorism may be a bit too extreme a word for it, it was simply a senseless killing.
A white fundamentalist Christian man who had ties to a radical organization decided to assassinate a man the radical organization did not like.
How is that not terrorism? Is it because the assassin's skin was white instead of black/brown, and the assassin's religion was Christianity instead of Islam?
I wouldn't care if the man was white, said GOD TELLS ME TO DO THIS, IN THE NAME OF JESUS-JIHAD-CRUSADE--DIRKA DIRKA JESUS DIRKA and shot the man in the heart. I wouldn't consider it terrorism.
It is exactly what Vast said, a senseless killing done by an idiot.
Although, I have to admit phuck, that you made a very strong point with that description and had me re-reading it a few times.
"Comments that make Fury go hmmm...."
hindsight being 20/20, I probably should have went with cutting his head off, rather than shooting him in the heart.
I fail at Islamic terrorist generalizations.
@Fury - At least I made you think.
And I'm sure the crazy fuck would have loved to chop the Doctor's head off, but I guess he thought God would have been pissed with all that blood in His house.
Post a Comment