The Obligatory Epic Farewell To President Bush

On the subject of George W. Bush's presidency, there have already been many postmortems written. Many of these are scathing, insult-filled diatribes for which the writers had been eagerly awaiting the opportunity to compose... for the last four-to-eight years.
Not this one.
While I will be the first to admit that I have not been a 'fan' of former-President Bush #43 (more: here, here & here), I am not going to use this piece as a means of criticism. Well, not all of it anyway... Rather, in a somewhat odd turn of events, I simply want to thank Mr. Bush.
Believe it or not, I voted for George W. Bush in the 2000 presidential election. Way back then (which seems like an eternity ago), Yours Truly was not the pajama-clad-politico that he is now. He wasn't any kind of politico. In the fall of that year, I was a fresh-out-of-college-graduate who was simply concerned with clearing the hops and barley from my brain. I had recently acquired a reasonabe entry-level job, and my collective knowledge of politics could be summed up in Saturday Night Live sketches. Sad, I know. But that is why I voted for Bush: I thought that Al Gore was boring and obsessed with 'lock boxes' and that George W. Bush was a more 'down-to-earth' guy. Someone with whom I would like to have a beer, as it were.
I say all of this not because I'm trying to cop-out of my vote that year, but rather to emphasize the importance of being knowledgeable. I have since come to the realization that it is incumbent upon us as Americans to know about subject matter as important as voting in a presidential election (or any election for that matter).
But I'm getting off topic...
I first started to pay attention to national politics in 2003. Surprisingly, not because of the war in Iraq, though that would later come to dramatically shape my views. At the time, like many other Americans, I bought the story about Saddam and WMDs and links to terrorism hook, line and sinker. Initially my foray into politics was attributable to -- of all things -- Howard Stern. At the time, I had to do a lot of traveling for my job. Long hours. In a car. At first music was my big thing -- driving from place to place with the windows down and the music up -- but like many things that eventually got old (and cold as the winter months set in). Since much of my travels were in New Jersey, I started listening to WYSP (out of Philadelphia) and KROCK (out of NYC). Each morning I would get up and listen to Howard and his crew on my way to whatever job I had that day.
In 2003, Michael Powell (son of General Colin Powell) was the head of the Federal Ccommunications Comission. At that time, the Stern show had been getting lots of fines and complaints via the FCC. This is where my political views began to take shape. I felt that government should have little to no impact on what was broadcast over the airwaves. If a listener didn't like what was on, they were free to change the channel/station. The fact that the FCC and other groups were going out of their minds over some stupidity was beyond me... not to mention all of the fines that were imposed upon broadcasters as a result. Thusly, my views of the Bush administration began to take shape. As the war in Iraq progressed (we all know how bad it got), and WMDs had yet to be found, my views continued to take shape. Abu Gharaib... my views continued to take shape. Etc. Etc. Etc. Needless to say, I developed a very negative view of our nation's Chief Executive -- and even moreso of his underlings (Cheney, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, et al).
Despite what I feel have been a trying eight years under his administration, I truly believe that George W. Bush made the decisions that he made for one reason: he thought what he was doing was best for our country. You can agree with that -- or disagree with that, as I'm sure many of you will voice in the comments. But in my heart of hearts, I do not believe that the former president is a 'bad person'. He is just a person, like you or me, who (I feel) made some particularly cantankerous decisions -- for which my children and grandchildren will pay the consequences.
Thank you for your service Mr. President. I appreciate the fact that the job is tough and you did the best that you were able. I may not have liked 90% of what you did (or perhaps 99%), but there is one very important thing for which I must thank you: you sparked an interest in politics inside of me that I never would have thought existed. This blog, in all of it's splendor (nooch), would not and could not exist if it weren't for your decisions and policies. For igniting a fire underneath my posterior Mr. President, I thank you.
















12 comments:
Politicians will tell you...the best kind of voter is the uneducated voter. They will take their vote EVERY TIME.
Thanks for this, PJP. It's always refreshing to hear someone explain how their political views developed. I find it really interesting that you were just leaving college in 2000, because I was just entering college then and not surprisingly my path was a bit different.
I was a bona fide Bush-hater during his first four years; I protested the Iraq war before it started and was basically a bleephole to anyone that thought it was a good idea. After college, you could say that I mellowed, but I like to think I matured. I still disagreed with most of Bush's decisions, but I stopped making a monster of him. I realized he's probably a solid dude with honest intents, but really shouldn't have applied for that job. He surrounded himself with some really crummy folks, and that's probably the biggest thing I hold against him.
While I am sorry you were hoodwinked in 2000, i somewhat agree with your opinion that he is a somewhat good guy. I think that statement is allowed because he generally was and is clueless. Clueless that he was a complete puppet, and just a figurehead that was setup to be the fall guy.
@Pal -- indeed. This is why I read read read all day long. It's too bad that I wasn't this driven in college, eh? (ed.note: Pajama Pal was a room-mate of mine in college)
@Jitter -- No sweat. I too have found that I've mellowed over the last couple of years. Either that, or I simply became numb to all that was going on...
I think that you are right-on in your analysis. Bush's biggest folly was appointing a bunch of cronies to his cabinet (I'm looking at you Rumsfeld).
Sorry,
But if you appoint yes men and then don't bother to look in to the decisions you need make, and instead rely on your gut, you are a 'bad person'.
Thanks for your comment Anonymous!
I will only go so far to say that Bush did appoint yes men. He didn't bother with follow-up on decisions he made. And yes, he did rely a great deal on his 'gut' feelings. However, I don't believe all of this makes him a bad person.
I think that he truly believed -- and still does believe -- that he was making decisions that were for the betterment of our country.
It is clear to me that in many (most) cases he was wrong -- or someone he had appointed was wrong -- but I don't believe that making mistakes makes you evil.
Thanks again for sharing your opinion -- and please do come back!
I'm with Anonymous on this one...
The pure heart/empty head defense is no excuse for the harm done. I have no sympathy or empathy for the man who followed terrible policies just because he's a simpleton.
It's comparable to saying a murderer is not to blame because he thought he was doing the best thing for his victim.
Wonderful piece [sic].
He's still an a-hole though. The only thing I can thank him for is not getting us all killed.
I, too, was someone who voted for Bush in 2000 due to my lack of interest in politics and taking the pundits at face value about Gore (not that my vote mattered in my blue state that Gore won). I have to say that all of the Bush failures gave a lot of us a wake up call to be more informed in our voting and for Democrats to get serious about a candidate (I did vote for Kerry in 2004, not that he was the best out there). Obama is no messiah or miracle worker (he was my Senator) but I know that he will do his damnedest to keep us from go over the cliff and I'm proud we managed to get him elected.
Comparing George Bush to a murderer
"he's still an A-hole"
a "bad person"
And this is all coming from people who are crying out that we conservatives need to compromise (something that Democrats did not do in the 8 years Bush was in office) and unify. PUH-LEASE. Why would I want to stand side by side people who call Presidents of the United States "a-holes".
When you all come down off your Bush Derangement Syndrome...then come talk to me about "unifying". Until then...with that type of rhetoric...we will have a divided country. And George Bush isn't to blame for your rhetoric...no matter how you try and spin it.
PJP - Excellent non-partisan fair and balanced article. I respectfully disagree with you on many issues - but I love to still call you friend because you are straight forward but don't throw hate around...I appreciate that.
*blushes*
I just call 'em the way that I see 'em...
I am a Canadian married to an American and don't have a vote. If I could vote, I would not have voted for Bush. But I had the chance to meet Bush while he was in office. Did I pass up the chance to meet him? No -- celebrity, star-struck I even shook his hand because agree or disagree, I was shaking his hand to honor the office of the Presidency. Anyhow, the picture is here.
http://www.squidoo.com/writing-portfolio#module14553272
But I also have a retrospective of all the Bush funny shoe stuff here.
http://www.squidoo.com/bush-shoe-video
Post a Comment