advertisement

30 January 2008

Master-Debaters: GOP Style


GOP presidential primary debate winner...
RON PAUL.

Sorry B-Diddy, but that's the truth right there.

I felt like John McCain was over-doing the accusations of "timetables" that he leveled against Mitt Romney. I also felt like there was way too much time spent debating that topic - which left Ron Paul and Mike Huckabee shrugging to each other about when they would get some air time.

When Huckabee did get the chance to speak - it was with grace and eloquence. BUT, the reason that I am awarding Ron Paul the gold medal for this debate is simple: he speaks the truth. While Mitt and John were going 10 rounds about Mitt's alleged lack-of-support for the Surge, Ron Paul pointed out that the candidates' time (and also the viewers') would be better spent debating their various positions on foreign policy.

All too often these contests become a media frenzy of sound bites and who-said-what-to-whom. I find that, as a voter, I make better and more informed decisions about my leaders when I know what the issues are - and where each candidate stands on the issues.

This debate left a bad taste in my mouth - in particular for Senator McCain - and that is rare for me since I'm such a political buff.

On to the Democrats tomorrow night....

------
Photo: Reuters

Alas, T'was Not Meant To Be

No live-blogging for me tonight. Other work requires my attention.

I will have the debate on, and maybe I'll get a minute to add some opinion here and there. BUT, if that doesn't happen, I'll surely drop some science here tomorrow.

Dermatologist

I'm off to an appointment with my dermatologist. Fun stuff.

I hope to be back in time to catch Rudy dropping out of the GOP primary race - and endorsing McCain.

Either way, you'll hear from me tonight during Republican debate.

Phallic Protest

Greenpeace activists turned the Washington Monument into a memorial to Bush's failed legacy on global warming.



The activists projected onto the Monument the message: U.S.Global Warming Plan: Hell and High Water accompanied by an image depicting rising sea levels at the base, a predicted consequence of global warming...


read more |

------
Photo: Bill Auth/Greenpeace

LiveBlog Redux

I'm toying with the idea of live-blogging the Republican debate tonight - and the Democratic debate tomorrow night (both on CNN).

Should I?

New Orleans Drop-Out

It is now apparently official.

John Edwards will drop-out of the race for the Democratic presidential nomination at 1:00 p.m. EST today in New Orleans, Louisiana.

So, what does this mean for the remaining candidates?

New Orleans Drop-Out?


Just across the news wire -

John Edwards is making an unscheduled stop in New Orleans to give a speech on poverty. This is the town where Edwards first announced his bid for the presidency. Will he take this opportunity to bow-out of the Democratic presidential race? If so, whom will he endorse?

------
Photo: Amanda McCoy/Getty Images

Ham Sandwich

There's been a lot of talk about whether or not the Republican party base will rally behind John McCain, should he become the party's nominee for the presidency. There are several ways to look at this question - but one stands out to me.

Jonah Goldberg on Morning Joe this morning:
If Hillary Clinton is the Democratic nominee, conservatives will rally around a ham sandwich.

29 January 2008

Prediction


I just got off of the phone with a fellow blogger and I told him this:

John McCain will be the nominee of the Republican party. He will chose Mike Huckabee as his running mate for the November 2008 general election.

Write that down.

You know that Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and all of the other right-wing kooks out there are pissing themselves right now. McCain and Huckabee?! Aren't they a bunch of liberals?!

Oh, and apparently Rudy Giuliani will be endorsing senator McCain tomorrow at the Reagan Library - just before the Republican debate on CNN.

Also worth noting was Mitt Romney's concession speech. Amid his ramblings about the economy and protecting our nation's borders, did anyone else notice his insane comment about children born out of wedlock? Yeah, seriously.
In his concession speech Tuesday night, Romney issued a call to arms to conservatives to support him, vowing to cut federal spending, end illegal immigration and teach children "that before they have babies, they should get married."
No sh*t. My wife and I literally burst out laughing and pointing at the television.

------
Photo: Charlie Neibergall/AP

DogFight

No kidding.

15 minutes ago, John McCain was leading Willard "Mitt" Romney by five whole percentage points. I know this because I was giving my daughter her bedtime sippy-cup of milk and watching the results come in. I went upstairs to tuck her in - and to say goodnight to my son - and when I got back downstairs in front of the boob-tube, I found that Willard is closing in quick... down to one percentage point right now.

YIKES. This is gonna be a long night!

Ledger's Last

A role for which he will surely be remembered.



Another reason that it is a shame that Heath Ledger is no longer with us.

Oh No, Not N.O.W.

I cannot believe this. Read it - weep (as I'm sure you will) and then comment if you so wish.
And now the greatest betrayal! We are repaid with his [Senator Ted Kennedy's] abandonment! He’s picked the new guy over us. He’s joined the list of progressive white men who can’t or won’t handle the prospect of a woman president who is Hillary Clinton (they will of course say they support a woman president, just not “this” one).
Mmmmkay.....

What. The. F**k.

The headline of this press release is "
Senator Kennedy Betrays Women by Not Standing For Hillary Clinton for President". So, how can this be? Apparently, if you don't don't want to vote for Hillary Clinton, you are a chest-beating, sport-loving, beer-guzzling, woman-get-me-some-dinner-yelling oppressive masculine turd.

Don't get me wrong - please. I'm all for equal rights for women. Bid it ever occur to the geniuses at the New York State National Organization for Women that some of us don't like Hillary Clinton - not because she has a vagina - but because of her political stance on the issues? This argument that N.Y.S.N.O.W. is spewing is akin to saying "hey, if you don't vote for Barack Obama for president, you are a racist who cannot deal with the idea of a person-of-color occupying the White House".

Yeah - doesn't make too much sense, does it?

The State Of The Union

In 60 seconds:


Could You Repeat The Question?


This is great. Some real straight-talk for you - Bill Richardson on Barack Obama being a good sport:
"I had just been asked a question -- I don't remember which one -- and Obama was sitting right next to me. Then the moderator went across the room, I think to Chris Dodd, so I thought I was home free for a while. I wasn't going to listen to the next question. I was about to say something to Obama when the moderator turned to me and said, 'So, Gov. Richardson, what do you think of that?' But I wasn't paying any attention! I was about to say, 'Could you repeat the question? I wasn't listening.' But I wasn't about to say I wasn't listening. I looked at Obama. I was just horrified. And Obama whispered, 'Katrina. Katrina.' The question was on Katrina! So I said, 'On Katrina, my policy . . .' Obama could have just thrown me under the bus. So I said, 'Obama, that was good of you to do that.'"
Very cool.

Governor Richardson is currently weighing his options in support for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. Both are appealing to him - and I think that he's having a little fun with both of the leading Democratic candidates vying for his endorsement.

------
Photo: J. David Ake/AP

TrueMajority

Mmm... cookies.

An interesting idea, to say the least.

Summing It Up

I know that I've been talking a lot about Barack Obama lately. Apparently, some readers think that I am endorsing him - or at least supporting his candidacy. Let's be clear on this fact - I have not yet endorsed any candidate from either political party.

I will admit that each time I see senator Obama speak, I find myself swell with pride for our country. He has the ability to make you want to get up off of your couch and DO SOMETHING.

That said, I think that he has some very left-leaning ideas and I still consider myself to be a solid centrist.

I think that Andrew Sullivan sums it up pretty well:
But let's be clear here: Compared to Bush, Obama is a conservative. He is promising nothing like the expansion of government or debt that Bush pushed through in eight years. Nothing like.
Indeed.

The policies and practices of the Bush administration are more big-government-liberal-spending than our country has seen in a long time (and in fairness the Congress deserves some of the blame too). What each of the democratic candidates are proposing is more conservative than what the current administration has done in eight years.

And to think that W ran on the ideas of fiscal conservatism and no nation-building. Gah.

28 January 2008

Here We Go: Perot

After all these years.... he's adding his two cents.

Still crazy. Apparently uneducated about Barack Obama's religious views and also believes that there were Vietnam POWs who were sent to the Soviet Union for human experimentation - and John McCain was involved in the cover-up.

Still poignant. Check out this gem:
Perot is appalled at the specter of big banks having to borrow from foreigners to stay afloat: "We have to go around the world with a tambourine and a tin cup."
Or this one:
"The situation in 1992 was not nearly as bad as it is now," he says. "If ever there was a time when it was necessary to put our house in order, it's now.

"It's like having cancer and being in denial. The conduct of the House and Senate is an embarrassment to the nation." President Bush, Perot says, is a "decent person, but you can't say the same thing about the people around him."

Interesting.

Obama's Victory Speech

I thought that this was worth viewing - if you haven't seen it already.



26 January 2008

Good Night

10:04 p.m.

...and I'm throwing in the towel. 26 blog posts today - most of them with some thought.

To you who have read my prose, I thank you. I will likely take tomorrow off - but Monday is the State-Of-The-Union address and I wouldn't want to miss that.

Good night.

Hillary Speaks

9:49 p.m.

Seriously - I totally feel bad for her right now. She's giving a quasi-concession speech, and it's really awkward. She sounds broken.

YES WE CAN


9:25 p.m.

I can say without any doubt or hesitation that Barack Obama is one of - if not THE most motivating and inspiring speaker in my lifetime.

He just gave a rousing 25 minute oration about change, about negative politics, about rising above the differences that we as a people face - and embracing the power of our similarities, the power of positivity and the power of endless possibilities.

If you missed it, I'm sure that it will be posted on BarackObama.com soon.

Just awesome.

------
Photo: Stefan Zaklin/European Pressphoto Agency

The Next Kennedy

8:52 p.m.

The numbers continue to grow. With 86% of the votes in...

Obama: 54%
Clinton: 27%
Edwards: 19%

Other breaking news -- in tomorrow's edition of the New York Times there will be an op-ed written by Caroline Kennedy titled "A President Like My Father". She will endorse Barack Obama.

That's pretty big.

I'm going to go watch his victory speech now - it's supposed to be a barn-burner.

8:00 Check-In

8:00 p.m.

With 15% of the votes in:

Obama - 52%
Clinton - 28%
Edwards - 20%

Better Than Anticipated

7:16 p.m.

Exit polling numbers are starting to come in and Obama has done better than expected in one crucial area: white voters.

Earlier this week, polling data suggested that Barack Obama might only receive about 10% of white voters support in the South Carolina primary - possibly because of some rough and rugged tactics used by the Clinton campaign (divide & conquer). BUT the exit polling now shows that Obama received a larger-than-expected 24% of white voters support.

In contrast, Hillary Clinton received 36% and John Edwards received 29%.

And The Winner Is...


7:01 p.m.

... Barack Obama.

Although the polls have just closed and the numbers will be coming in soon, MSNBC has projected that Barack Obama is the winner of the South Carolina Democratic presidential primary election. And, to make matters worse for Clinton and Edwards, Obama will win by a "substantial margin".

We'll see how the numbers shake out.

------
Photo: Jeff Haynes/AFP/Getty Images

Ten Minute Bell

6:50 p.m.

*DING*

Ten minutes until the polls close in South Carolina.

I'm waiting with baited breath...

Oh, and my dinner of hot dogs, broccoli and tortilla chips with salsa was deee-lish. My kids thought so too.

Yummers

Mental Health Break

5:52 p.m.

HA!

Are You Experienced... Yet?

5:24 p.m.

A follow-up to my earlier post about Hillary's supposed "35 years of experience".

NPR has an article asking the question - but I still don't have any answers. NPR just admits that candidates on the campaign trail often embellish their records.

Ugh.

I'm Still Here

5:11 p.m.

It's been nearly an hour since my last post - and that's not a mistake.

I must admit that when I first envisioned live-blogging all day today, I thought that there would be more political fodder about which I would post. But, the more that I think about it, I believe that the real fun will begin when polling data starts to come in after 7:00 p.m. (when the polls close in SC).

So, please do stay tuned - for I will be furiously blogging well into the late-night hours.

Oh, and if you haven't already noticed, I've placed a subscription box in the right-hand column of the blog. If you are a regular reader, please do subscribe. You'll receive a notification via e-mail every time that I post.

You can also do it here:

enter your e-mail address:

Delegate Data

4:16 p.m.

Since we're looking exclusively (almost) at the Democratic candidates today, I thought that I would throw this information into the mix. Delegate count.
Candidate Delegates
won to date
Delegates needed
Barack Obama381,987
Hillary Clinton361,989
John Edwards182,007

Yeah, it's a close one. South Carolina is indeed an important win for one of these three candidates - seeing that there are 54 delegates up for grabs.

Shut The Huck Up


3:46 p.m.

Mike Huckabee has a point here: the Dems are really f**kin' MEAN!

Say what you will about the Republicans (they are all old, white men who are exceedingly boring and have very little in differing viewpoints), but at least they act civil with each other on a stage.

I truly believe that the Democratic debate in South Carolina will hurt both the Clinton and Obama campaigns. This is why John Edwards is smart to stay FAR AWAY from his two competitors. Let them duke it out.

------
Photo: Stan Honda/AFP/Getty Images

Coffee Talk (Cawh-fee Tawhk)

3:07 p.m.

I love Dunkin' Donuts coffee. I love it almost as much as I love blogging all day...

Inquiring Minds Want B.O.

2:43 p.m.

The Philadelphia Inquirer has officially endorsed Barack Obama.

Meanwhile, the mayor of Philly, as well as the governor of Pennsylvania have both endorsed Hillary Clinton.

Sheesh.

Are You Experienced?


2:04 p.m.

I keep hearing the same thing from the Clinton campaign: 35 years of experience.

It repeats in my head over, and over, and over again. But I have yet to hear exactly what that experience is.

I'm not saying that Hillary doesn't have experience - but what experience does she have that helps to qualify her for the presidency? She's been a member of the U.S. Senate for nearly eight years now, right? Before that, she was the First Lady of our country (and aside from a failed attempt at health care reform, didn't do much else).

Prior to her occupation of the White House via MARRIAGE, Mrs. Clinton was the First Lady of Arkansas - and what did she do there?

I'm asking legitimate questions here kids - what does "35 years of experience" mean? More importantly, why isn't anyone else in the media asking this question?!

------
Photo: Mannie Garcia/Getty Images

The Edwards Allure

1:41 p.m.

John Edwards makes a good point: what will the squabbling between Barack and Hillary do for America?

Does arguing about who sat on the board of Wal-Mart, or who took campaign money from a "slum-lord" have any impact on health-care, education, the environment, the war(s) or the economy?

No.

Get on with it.

Mmm... Lunch

1:23 p.m.

After cooking and feeding lunch to my kids - and then cleaning up - I'm back.

Let's continue the conversation, shall we?

Battle Flag


11:04 a.m.

Gah. The Confederate battle flag.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the South lost. Secession never succeeded. Lincoln united our country in a way that no president has done since (and heaven knows we need right now).

So, how is this an issue for a presidential campaign? Sure, there are those in the south (and in South Carolina) who would like to see the Confederate flag in more public places than simply on top of an orange 1969 Dodge Charger - but how is this a federal issue?

Simple: it's not. It's a state's issue.

Move on people. Nothing to see here.

State-Of-The-Union

10:43 a.m.

Amidst all of this hoopla in South Carolina, let us not forget the my buddy George W. will be addressing the nation on Monday night.

Should be a real positive speech the way that things seem to be going at home and abroad.

*sigh*

Joe's Point


10:27 a.m.

I'm watching Joe Scarborough right now - and he's making a good point about former president Clinton going too far in his zeal for Hillary's campaign.
Looking past all of the issues of race and gender in the Democratic primary, Bill Clinton is continuing to use polarizing campaign tactics in looking to the general election this year. He's been saying things like:
The only people that she’s a polarizing figure around are people who don’t know her... The reason I think she’s the most electable Democrat has nothing to do with race or gender. It is that they have systematically polarized the country, the right-wing Republican faction has. They first took over the Republican Party and then they performed reverse plastic surgery on all the Democrats.
Yeah.

I'm not saying that he's right or wrong - I'm simply saying that it's useless. It's the same kind of political tactics that Rove and the like have been using for the past eight years. What the hell does that have to do with the South Carolina primaries?! (since he made these comments at a town-hall meeting in Spartanburg, South Carolina)

Talking negatively about the "other side" does not help us normal folk distinguish the great differences in political theory or practice between the parties. It does however, paint a very negative picture of the opposition. Listening to Bill Clinton yammer on about how evil the GOP is, and how they will demonize Hillary Clinton in a general election certainly does leave a bad taste in my mouth.

------
Photo: Melissa Haneline/The Post & Courier/AP

Obama's Contradiction


9:47 a.m.

Why is it that Barack Obama is losing white voters in South Carolina?
  • He won Iowa - which has a ~95% white population.
  • He performed fairly well in New Hampshire - a predominantly white electorate.
  • He performed exceedingly well in rural Nevada, with a strong majority of white voters.
Why are white voters in South Carolina turning away from him?

------
Photo: Jim Mone/AP

More Race

9:17 a.m.

Okay folks - here's the deal.

Apparently, the media-types who are accusing the Clintons of injecting race into the campaign are saying this:

Simply by mentioning the idea that "race and gender are NOT an issue to voters" is making race an issue.

Now, I will admit that saying this will bring attention to the subject of race, but here's a news-flash for America: race IS an issue. It's an ugly reality in our country, but that's the truth folks. Straight-talk, like it or not.

I'm not saying that people pull a lever or punch a voter card by basing their vote on race. I'm simply saying that people notice the color of a candidates skin. Is it exciting that Barack Obama is the first man of color who is a viable presidential candidate? HELL YES. Is it exciting that Hillary Clinton is the first woman who is a viable presidential candidate? HELL YES. But, the simple fact that those two things are exciting make them issues in each respective campaign.

Race and gender ARE issues in the Democratic presidential race - but not necessarily in a negative way.

Dear John


9:05 a.m.

You have to feel bad for John Edwards. As I mentioned in the last post - the media is seemingly obsessed with the battle between Hillary and Barack. Poor John Edwards has gotten lost in the shuffle.

This is SPITE of the fact that he has been performing very well on the campaign trail - the South Carolina debate this week was solid evidence of this.

Maybe people will get tired of the Clinton/Obama scuffle and swing their votes in Edwards' direction...

... or maybe not.

------
Photo: Erik Jacobs/New York Times

Race For Race

8:27 a.m.

Someone PLEASE explain this to me.

As I've been watching the pundits, everyone is talking about the "race card" being played. They're saying that the Obama campaign doesn't want to portray Senator Obama as the "black candidate". That's all well and good - but the pundits are accusing the Clinton camp of interjecting race into the campaign. They say that "Bill Clinton played the "race card'."

Don't get me wrong - I loathe the fact that the former president is stumping so hard for his wife. I'm rooting for Barack Obama in this case. BUT - did I miss something? When did Bill Clinton play the race card? What did he say? Why hasn't he been branded a racist and bigot?

My assumption is that the media is making a proverbial mountain out of a mole-hill.

...not that I'm one to blame the media for everything, but that's how it appears to me.

LiveBlog Start

7:03 a.m.

All day today, I'm going to live-blog the South Carolina Democratic primary... so BUCKLE UP!

This should be an interesting undertaking, both on my part (will I be able to stick with it?) and on the part of the politics. South Carolina is shaping up to be quite a decisive contest for the remaining Democratic presidential candidates.

21 January 2008

Debate Smack-Down

WOW!

If you didn't see the Democratic debate tonight, it was crazy! I'll have more commentary tomorrow - it's way past my bedtime.

19 January 2008

NV & SC

LOVE IT!

Today is like the SUPERBOWL of politics (well, so far anyway)!

My wife and I are going to snuggle up, pop some movie-butter-popcorn and watch the returns come in!

I live for this stuff.

17 January 2008

E-mail Punditry

This is an e-mail that I sent to several friends and former co-workers who are all political nerds like me. We are having a group discussion about politics and I thought that it summed up my views (rather concisely) about the presidential election thus far.


My fellow pundits and policy-wonks,

In the long run:

Republican Ticket = McCain/Huckabee (or possibly Romney in there somewhere - but I doubt it)

Giuliani put all of his eggs in the Florida basket, and all of his eggs are stamped with "9/11". Not gonna happen for him. Huckabee is charming (albeit scary - see Debi's comments), but does not have ANY foreign policy experience or name recognition for a national general election. Thompson is asleep and Romney is a flip-flopperoo.

Ron Paul rules - but I'm realistic about his chances to get the nomination.

Democratic Ticket = Scary. Hopefully we'll see Barack Obama paired up with someone like Chris Dodd or Joe Biden (young guy with fresh ideas + old guy with TONS of relevant experience = winner), but I must admit that right now the Clinton machine is nothing short of frightening. My dad has said that if Hillary Clinton wins the presidency, he will erect a large flagpole in his front year and fly the American flag at half-mast for the duration of her time in office. Indeed.

I do hope that Hillary is NOT the democratic nominee. I'm tired of dynastic presidential politics in our country. There has been either a Bush or a Clinton running for president in every election for nearly 30 years. Yuck.

... and poor John Edwards. The guy has fallen back in the polls and he's just trying to get people to listen to him. What has he thinking? A white male could never win the Democratic nomination! (easy ladies - I'm being sarcastic!)\

Any way that you look at things, we are going to have a very interesting year this year!

Johnny Mac Attack


As any avid reader of this blog will know, I've been critical of senator John McCain in the past. His view on the war in Iraq troubles me in particular. However, I've also made it perfectly clear that this guy is a friggin' hero. Anyone - I repeat - ANYONE who dons a uniform (be it military OR civilian) in service to this great nation is a hero in my book. But to go beyond that and serve in a war overseas, get captured, held prisoner and repeatedly tortured - well that's just waaaaaaaay above and beyond the call-of-duty.

But take a look at these jerks.

Read this page. I can't believe that there are people out there who actually think that John McCain is the Manchurian Candidate that has come to life. They honestly think that he was brainwashed by the north Vietnamese and was sent back home to be a sleeper agent in Congress, and eventually take the White House.

Oh, and he has ties to the friggin' mob too.

Unreal.

I thought that the Swift Boat Veterans were a bunch of loons back in 2004 - but these crackpots are REALLY far gone.

At least it's getting a "crackpot" label in the mainstream media.

------
Photo: Brett Flashnick/AP

16 January 2008

Sh*tt Romney

... won Michigan.

Yuck.

The only good news for me - my Guitar Hero III bundle arrived last night.


Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeet.

15 January 2008

M&M's And Politics

That's what I'm doing tonight.

Debate at 9:00. Michigan primary results sprinkled in periodically like the M&M's candies on my lap.

I live for this stuff.

Hannity Profanity


Yes.

HELL YES.

Money line:
I called into the Sean Hannity show about his constant "dissing" of Senator McCain on this plan...his screener would NOT...I repeat...WOULD NOT let me talk to him. According to his screener, Sean would not take a call from me on Senator McCain. Could it be that Sean Hannity knows what I know...HE HIMSELF ALSO does not have a plan to deport 12 million people from this country. I know they are here illegally...they are breaking the law...but how do we punish these people? Are we really ready as a country to deport 12 MILLION people or more? My gosh...can you imagine the man labor, money and time it will take for this to happen?
Yes indeed.

14 January 2008

The Growing Rifts

A conservative friend of mine (and fellow pundit) wrote to me and posed this query:
Elephants [Republicans] – can’t find a candidate and there hasn’t been a front runner to this point…opinions are shifting all over the place and there hasn’t been a clear winner yet. Who knows who it will be in the long run…but not many Republicans are bickering among other Republicans because for the most part…we can deal and like most of the candidate (exit Romney in my case). Could we unite behind a candidate once they are picked despite the “fluidity” among the candidates.

Jackasses (or Donkeys) [Democrats] – united strongly behind a Obama or Hillary and right now…the racism comments and MTP [Meet The Press] segments with her are showing a true divde among her and Obama…and possibly among their supporters. Could they not rally behind the other candidate in the long run if this campaign between Clinton and Obama gets even more heated?

Could we see a split in the Dems and a Unification of the Republicans once the nominee is picked…I don’t know. But I will tell you there are a LOT of Democrats who DON’T LIKE HILLARY and could either NOT vote or SWITCH over to an independent thinker like McCain (or even Rudy…Huckabee has a lot to overcome on that side of the aisle).

Thoughts?

Well gee-willikers - where do I begin?

I guess that I would have to start by saying - wow, that's a very interesting proposition. Interesting indeed.

I think that my friend may be onto something here. It seems that all of the political news stories today are centered around the idea that Hillary Clinton (and her surrogates) have been trying to push the "drug angle" against Barack Obama. In addition, the comments that the junior senator from New York made about Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and his impact on the civil rights movement (or what appeared to have been comments about his pseudo-impact) have also angered many people. On the flip-side of the coin, the Obama campaign has come under criticism from Clinton supporters for "playing the race card". Either way, the point is that there are very ardent supporters of both campaigns - of that there is no doubt. Where there IS some doubt is whether or not an Obama supporter would endorse Hillary Clinton - were she to get the Democratic nomination - or vice-versa.

It seems that the Democratic party is somewhat split over these two candidates - which could mean some very bad news when it comes to a general election. However, I don't fully agree with my friend's assessment of the GOP side of the ticket.

Sure, Hillary and Obama are slugging it out in the polls right now, but so are their Republican counterparts. I have seen countless stories about how social conservatives would never support (the very liberal) Rudy Giuliani (or Romney for that matter) - so much so that there has even been talk of a third-party conservative candidate to represent the Evangelical movement of conservatives. Also, there are many fiscal conservatives who are seemingly disenfranchised with Mike Huckabee - based on his record as governor of Arkansas. I won't even get into the confusion and dissolution that Dr. Ron Paul causes within his own party.

So, it seems to me that while there is a growing rift in the Democratic party, there is also quite a sizable ravine that has already been in place for the Republicans.

I think that the bottom line is this; whichever party can most easily bridge it's respective gap (and get the majority of the independent vote) will emerge as the victor this November.

Snoogans.

13 January 2008

Clay Don't Play


I know it's completely off topic for me, but I ran across this interview with Clay Aiken (you know, the quasi-masculine fellow who placed second on American Idol a couple of years ago) from Newsweek Magazine.

It's rather uncomfortable near then end of the conversation. I almost feel bad for the guy - and then I remember how much friggin' money he has...

Ugh.

Reason #573 Why Bill O'Reilly Is A Douchebag

Fairly self-explanatory.



The fact that Faux News Channel is supremely biased against Obama doesn't help either.

No offense Brian.

12 January 2008

Cooking Geese


Have you heard about this?

I can't say that I'm surprised - but I can say that I'm somewhat PLEASED. Rudy has been focusing his campaign on the "big" states - starting with FLORIDA. And now we see that some of his staffers are foregoing their January salary in an effort to conserve resources. Yikes.

Money line:
“Some people volunteered to do it,” Mr. Giuliani said in a video on the Fox News Web site. “We didn’t ask anyone to do it. Some people volunteered to do it, because they wanted to stretch out the money."
I hate to be Mr. Buzzkill here Rudy, but by the time all of the other campaigns get to Florida, it's going to be too late for you. How many news cycles will we have gone through with pundits, pollsters and political-geeks like me and this guy shouting "HUCKABEE WINS", "MCCAIN WINS", etc... before you make even one headline (save for this one about your campaign hemorrhaging money)?

...and folks, I'm sure that I don't need to remind you all that none of the above takes into consideration the fact that Rudy is a douchebag.

Ha ha.... Giuliani's proverbial goose is cooked.

------
Photo: Bebeto Matthews/AP

09 January 2008

Bye-Bye Bill


You've made a valiant effort Bill - and I commend you for it. However, it is indeed time for you to get out.

Cross your fingers for a vice-presidential bid... or maybe a stint as Secretary of State.

------
Photo: Charlie Niebergall/AP

New Hampshire Is Crazy


To think that this was the SECOND place winner? I hope you watched it all... if not, go to 10:10 and watch until the end of the clip. Simply. Inspiring.

I'm sorry folks, but Obama could have come in last place and still have won - with a speech like this.

McCain took the GOP side - for which I am grateful. I know that Furious D will probably blast me for not plugging Ron Paul (a candidate for whom I have tremendous respect and admiration), but I'm a realistic pundit: the Good Doctor is going to make a fantastic third-party candidate.

I'm pleased that Senator McCain won New Hampshire for the simple reason that he is NOT Willard "Mitt" Romney or Rudy Giuliani. I have respect for McCain, but my ideal situation for the GOP would be to run Ron Paul.

On to Nevada!!!

04 January 2008

Barack Star


Wow.

Look, I think that there is a real movement happening here - in BOTH of the major political parties.

On the democratic side of the coin, I am nearly speechless. After all of the talk of "Clinton Inevitability", Barack Obama has shown that nothing is truly inevitable. In a state whose residents are predominantly white and conservative, the fact that so many Republicans and independents (not to mention Democrats) voted for Obama is truly stunning. I believe that all of this talk of hope and change is having a real impact on our country - because that is just what is needed.

Oh, and I love the fact that John Edwards came in second place, pushing Hillary down to third. Awesome.


Flip the coin over and we see Mike Huckabee giving Willard "Mitt" Romney a HUGE spanking. Romney outspent Huckabee nearly 20 to 1 in Iowa campaigning - and yet the voters see something in Huckabee. Talk about a true underdog story! Huckabee has done just what people want - talk about what he wants to do with our country. BUT, the big difference between him and Mitt is that Huckabee has stayed POSITIVE. I truly believe that Americans are sick and tired of negative politics and attack ads. Bring on the rainbows and sunshine!

I'm pleased to be an American today - now if we can keep this momentum going through New Hampshire next week...

------
Photo: Jeff Haynes/AFP/Getty
Photo: Jim Young/Reuters

03 January 2008

Like A Child

... opening presents on Christmas morning. That's how I feel.

There's something so exciting about the presidential primaries this year.

Maybe it's the inspirational speeches that the candidates give. Maybe it's the feeling of pride that you get from taking an active part in the democratic process. Maybe it's the idea that we, as a country, are just one step closer to kicking G.W. Bush out of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Or maybe it's some combination of all. I don't know what it is, but I have had the cable news channels locked on my televisions all day yesterday and today - and I'll likely be staying up waaaay past my bedtime tonight.

LOVE. IT.

Corporate Overlords

Store

Masthead

Voices:
Elsewhere:
  • The Pajama Pundit's featured article at Blogs.com.
  • The Pajama Pundit's contributions at Donklephant.

previous mastheads | site credits | contact | advertising | legal