advertisement

31 July 2007

Summer Vacation

It's that time of year - when the sun is so hot that you can't even sit still in a room and make laws.

... even though there are members of the U.S. Military outside wearing 100 pounds of gear to keep your ass safe.

Simply a travesty. I don't care how hot it gets.

Shameful.

Cheney Reaction


Why am I not surprised that this, the shadiest-of-shady men in Washington, is standing by two men who have lied.

One, Cheney's former chief-of-staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby, has been convicted of perjury. The other, the Attorney General of the United States Alberto "Al" Gonzales, has been caught telling a lie (or several lies) while giving testimony to Congress.

So, why am I not surprised that "Trigger-Finger-Dick" is standing by these guys?

It's simple: He is pure evil.

- OR -

He is protecting himself and the President from implicating themselves in some of the bad stuff that goes on in the White House.

I think it's a little bit of both.

Honestly though - in the case of Alberto Gonzales - how long can the Bush Administration stand by this guy? You know that it's a bad scene when other Republican senators are calling Gonzo a "liar" and telling him, "I don't trust you."

I'm just waiting for the late Friday announcement that Alberto Gonzales is getting the proverbial axe. It's just not right to have a liar heading up the Department of Justice. That's somewhat of an oxymoron. Insert joke here.

------
Photo: Ron Edmunds/AP

Hackers

One VERY GOOD REASON to push for election reforms.

Why doesn't every state vote the same way?

No, really. I'm asking. Comment if you have the answer.

Hell, just comment.

Joe, Schmoe

A Democrat. That's what he calls himself. Well, it's what he used to call himself.

Ugh.

Don't get me wrong, I think it's great that he won his senate re-election as an independent candidate - after having his ass handed to him in the Connecticut Democratic primary elections.

But c'mon Joe - bring those troops home! Or at least give them longer vacations between tours (yes that's right folks - Joe Lieberman voted AGAINST an amendment to extend time between troop deployments).

Clinton Redux


Ugh. Here we go.

It seems as though the family is getting prepared for another Clinton run-for-the-presidency. A CHELSEA Clinton run.

I'm telling you - if they had it their way, Hillary would win in 2008, then Jenna or Barbara Bush would run on a dual-ticket and win in 2016, then Chelsea would get her turn as family-member-in-chief in 2032.

A cynic might say that there is a dynastic tinge to American presidential politics...

Ew.

------
Photo: Chris Hondros/Getty Images

Those Damn Tubes

Original ouch. Ouch. Ouch. And more ouch.

I've said it before, these Republicans just cannot catch a break!

He can't blame this one on the "series of tubes".

Check it:
I urge Alaskans not to form conclusions based upon incomplete and sometimes incorrect reports in the media. The legal process should be allowed to proceed so that all the facts can be established and the truth determined. - Ted Stevens (R-Ak)
So, I noticed that there was no claim of innocence in there. Usually, when the proverbial sh*t hits the proverbial fan, politicians start yelling about their innocence. Don't they?

Yeah, I don't hear any yelling...

Happiness Is...

Happiness is being four-years-old and playing with a buddy.

My boy is on the left and his counterpart on the right. It was a good weekend - needless to say.

30 July 2007

What The F**k?

Today in What The F**k, we examine the seemingly perpetual idiocy of some Congressional Republicans (not to mention the Bush administration).

The Hill has an interesting article regarding the feelings of several congressmen as well as polling numbers for Congress, the White House as well as the war in Iraq.

"Republicans fear another beating". Excuse me for saying so, but...

NO. SHIT.

For the next couple of sentences, I'm going to speak in generalities - so please forgive me if you think that a handful of Congressional Republicans are doing a good job (as I'm sure there are).

I'm sorry, but the GOP let the ENTIRE country down. Period. End of sentence. Do you remember the lessons that were were taught in grade school? You know, the stuff about Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, Ben Franklin, The original George W. and the entire posse that bucked the system and formed a nation "For the people, by the people and of the people" (as Lincoln described it). Yeah, those lessons that we learned as CHILDREN taught us that there are THREE branches of government; the Legislative, the Judicial and the Executive. These three branches were designed to keep each other in check - hence the phrase "checks and balances" - so that one branch (the Executive in particular) could not amass more power than the others.

Thanks to our friends in the Republican party, those "checks" were chucked right out of the window. In the past six years there has been NO check on the Executive. None.

Now, we find ourselves asking TONS of questions about the Bush administration - and getting stonewalled trying to find the answers.

It's time to wake up America. Let's get some answers - and restore the "checks and balances".

------
Photo: Larry Downing/Reuters

Air Piratical Aggressions

"Air piratical aggressions and depredations" = terrorism on September 11th, 2001.

So says Ron Paul.

Dr. Paul (R-Tx) is re-submitting legislation that would encourage private citizens, rather than our military, to hunt down Osama bin Laden (and those associated with him, namely al Qaeda) as well as his property.

Check it:
Paul offered this proposal back in October 2001, arguing that it would allow “Congress to authorize the President to specifically target Bin Laden and his associates using non-government armed forces. Since it is nearly impossible for U.S. intelligence teams to get close to Bin Laden, the marque and reprisal approach creates an incentive for people in Afghanistan or elsewhere to turn him over to the [United States].”
I love Ron Paul - I really do. The guy speaks his mind and does not care about the polls, the critics, the blogosphere, etc. I think that is why he is SO popular with younger voters activists.

However - this alleged legislation is bunk. Paul wants the U.S. government to condone a bunch of pseudo Boba Fetts to go and capture/mame/kill arguably the most wanted man in the world? These "non-government armed forces" would be sent into other countries, nay SOVEREIGN NATIONS to carry out what can only be described as an assasination - or kidnapping at the very least.

Yeah - this will definitely help to restore the moral upstanding of the United States.

Fudraising Flop?


Former Senator Fred Thompson (R-Tn) has been teasing the GOP for several months now - making most Republicans wonder aloud, "Geez, is this guy going to run for the presidency or what?"

While many have touted Thompson as the "savior" for the Republican party - referring to the lackluster support of the current crop of candidates - it seems that Ole Freddy has not raised as much campaign cash as first anticipated.

I would like to point out that the three million dollars that he HAS raised was in just under one month's time - and he hasn't officially announced his candidacy yet. I'd say that's not too shabby from where I'm sitting.

But he still has a long way to go to reach the numbers that Giuliani and Romney are putting up - not to mention the Democrats, who are simply pummeling the Republican candidates in campaign fund raising.

------
Photo: Steve Helber/AP

Funny Of The Week

As I mentioned at the end of last week, I have been absent from the blogosphere because we received some company over the weekend. Everyone has now returned home, and while it was great to have so many visitors - it's also nice to have a quiet house once again. I can only take so much wrestling and screaming from four-year-old boys.

I've got lots of stuff to talk about this week - so I should get reading.

I'm starting something new today. Every Monday, I'm going to post a "funny of the week". This way - if you are like me and hate Mondays - you can start your week off with a laugh instead of a cringe.

Continuing with the Monday theme - this week's Funny is from Office Space. I think I've got a "case of the Mondays"...

Enjoy.

26 July 2007

Weekender

Hey folks -

Getting started on my weekend a bit early this week. We are receiving company at our house for the long weekend. I will likely not have much time to post as I will be entertaining guests. If anything truly earth-shattering happens, you'll hear from me. Otherwise, enjoy your weekend.

Oh, and based on some feedback that I've received, I've categorized all of my posts (what a job) with tags. They are on the right column of the blog. I also added some text to the "about me" section. Enjoy.

25 July 2007

Gonzales On Torture


My head is spinning. So, you can't do anything sexually or religiously degrading to a detainee - that's torture - but you can dunk their head in water or make them think they are going to die - that's not torture.

Rrrrrrright.

Head Nod: TalkingPointsMemo

Con-Tempting

The House Judiciary Committee has voted that Josh Bolten and Harriet Myers are in contempt of Congress for not appearing to testify.

*yawn*

Wake me up when something interesting is happening.

The Specter In The Supreme Court

Arlen Specter (R-Pa) is one of my senators. Not only is he from Pennsylvania - but he is also a moderate Republican. Therefore, I feel both a geographic and a political kindred spirit betwixt us.

Now, he is researching what both Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito testified to the Senate Judiciary committee during both of their hearings.
The Specter inquiry poses a potential political problem for the GOP and future nominees because Democrats are increasingly complaining that the Supreme Court moved quicker and more dramatically than advertised to overturn or chip away at prior decisions.

Specter, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, who served as chairman during the hearings, said he wants to examine whether Roberts and Alito have "lived up" to their assurances that they would respect legal precedents.
Indeed. One would assume that the judges who sit on the highest court in the land would "respect legal precedents".

President Cheney?!

Fancy New Duds

... whatever that means.

Yes, my regular readers (all three of you) have probably noticed already that I've got some nifty new artwork on the blog. It took us a little while to figure out how to format the page so that it would work - but I think we've got a pretty good handle on things for now. A very angry likeness of me. Grrr!

Shout-out to Albert at Albertropolis for all of the creativity.

Malkin Milk Shake


Oh Michelle Malkin - you are nothing but a wanna-be-Bill-O-Reilly. At least you are more attractive than that falafel-sporting-bag-of-skin. Ick.

24 July 2007

Master-Debaters: Democrat Edition #1


Think of this as the 'Cliffs Notes' version of the first DNC sanctioned Democratic presidential primary debate. This is what you wind up reading after you decided to watch re-runs of Friends on TBS instead of being civic-minded and involving yourself in the democratic process.

Last night's Democratic debate was... well... it was many things. Interesting. Provocative. Different. The same.

I must admit - I enjoyed the YouTube aspect of this debate. I really felt like the questions that were asked had a real resonance with the American public. I was especially moved by the question from the father of a fallen soldier. The gentleman had not one, not two, but THREE flags behind him. One for his grandfather, one for his father - and one for his SON. That was a powerful image. Here's the clip:

Overall, I think that this was the best debate (of either party) so far. I think there was a great balance of serious questions and answers, evened out by some witty and funny questions - and responses. One of my favorites:

I simply adored the responses by the candidates - especially Barack Obama. "We, we don't have Mitt Romney money, but..."

Hilarious.

However, I still felt that the low point in this debate - like the others that preceded it - was the unfair balance of time. Mike Gravel even made light of his situation several time, and got applause for it. And, as crazy as he occasionally sounds (and last night was no exception), he makes a good point: the format for these debates is skewed to serve the so-called-frontrunners. The so-called second and third tier candidates get left in the shuffle to fight for the proverbial table scraps.

Speaking of the non-frontrunners, I really thought that several of them stood out last night.

Joe Biden BLEW me away. I never really gave him a second-look before last night, but he really did impress me with his experience, knowledge - and most of all his candor. All too often it seems that candidates - for any office, not just the Presidency - will dance around issues and 'sugar-coat' their rhetoric. Biden wasn't doing that last night. For example, when talking about troop withdrawals from Iraq, Biden simply said (and I'm paraphrasing) look, there's no way that you can get ALL American troops out of Iraq in less than one year. Logistically, it's just not possible to move that many troops in such a short amount of time. So, as much as I hated to hear that fact, Biden raises a good point: all of the candidates who say that they are going to bring the troops home - that job is going to take a lot longer than they are saying it will.

And, I also must admit that for the first time since I started following politics... Dennis Kucinich looked and sounded presidential. I'm not saying he's going to win the nomination - hell, I'm not sure that he could beat Mike Gravel - BUT the way that he commanded the podium during the little time he had to speak was quite impressive.

Finally, Chris Dodd - the "guy with the white hair" - absolutely took the award for the best 'YouTube style ad'.

Nice. Humorous - but with a point. I may not agree with all of Dodd's views, but he is also a qualified candidate who is struggling to get out of the shadow of the frontrunners.

In the end, there were many, like myself who were growing weary (already) of debates for the 2008 presidential election. Personally, I felt that this debate - and it's format in particular - recharged my 'presidential debate batteries'. I'm all psyched up for the Republicans in September.

Really. I am.

No joke.

------
Photo: Reuters

Shout-Out

I'm sending positive energy to my friend the Left-Wing Skirt as she takes the Missouri Bar Exam today.

Ew. I wouldn't want to sit all day and take a mammoth test like that.

Good luck Liz.

Vitter-Sweet Irony

Just when I thought that I could escape the onslaught of the fanatically-religious-conservative-politicians and their condemnation of all-things-sinful - only to be caught with their proverbial (or literal) pants down. They strike again.

Granted, it's a small-time politician - a local dude in North Carolina. BUT, it proves the point.

Head Nod: Andrew Sullivan

Debate coverage to come - working on a doosie-of-a-post.

23 July 2007

More Dr. Paul


Great column in the New York Times about the "fringe" Republican candidate.

Worth reading.

The Wife is ill. No more posts today. Enjoy the debate tonight.

------
Photo: Elise Amendola/AP

Tasty Debate Coverage

Full of flavor and chock-full-o'-nuts. Namely Mike Gravel.

Coverage of tonight's debate to be large and in-charge tomorrow.

Yummy.

Watch-Your-Back, Potter

Al Qaeda looking to attack J.K. Rowling?

An odd choice indeed, but as Blake Hounshell notes:
Thousands of irate Potter-heads would be storming the mountains of Waziristan in no time.
So, it might be time to think of a new plan al Qaeda.

Head Nod: Jeb Koogler at TMV

Weddings

...sure are fun. Especially when there is an open bar from 3 p.m. to 11 p.m.

Yikes.

Needless to say, I'm back and I'm ready to tackle the issues that are important - like Mitt Romney equating Senators Clinton and Obama with Osama bin Laden. Observe:

Yeah. Nice.

It would be even better if the woman who made the sign could SPELL. Or, maybe she just isn't a fan of the Museum of Modern Art. Ugh.

It could be a really long week...

------
Photo: TMZ.com

20 July 2007

Fly Me To The Moon


38 years ago today.

Do you believe?

Do you not believe?

I do. And I think that American pride needs to be restored to the same level that it was during those times.

Thoughts?

The Bullsh*t Roundup, Part Five


This is how it's going down.

Gee Walker Bee is going to Camp David for his colonoscopy. During this time, he will transfer the power of the Office of the President to Richard B. Cheney.
Because the president will be under the effects of anesthesia, he has elected to implement Section 3 of the 25th Amendment to the Constitution, making Cheney acting president until Bush indicates he is prepared to reassume his authority.
All other members of the 'Axis-Of-Evil' had better watch their asses. I'm looking in your direction, Iran...


------
Photo: Joshua Roberts/Reuters

Early Weekend

My parental units have come to town this weekend (they arrived yesterday, hence the single post). The Wife and I are going to be in and out of the house sporadically this weekend due to a best-friend's-wedding in which the Wife is a bridesmaid. I'll post when I can, IF I can. What does this wedding mean for me?

Good times. Fun.

Meanwhile, read this as compared to my post yesterday. Also check out this, this, this and this.

If you don't hear from me - have a great weekend!

19 July 2007

Sexy Kindergartners


A lot has been made about Barack Obama's comments yesterday that he supports "age-appropriate sex-education for kindergarten students".

Joe Scarborough was saying that anyone who believes that young children should have sex-education is committing political suicide.

I'm not sure I agree.

Look, I'm not going to suggest that my four-year-old son needs to be told the itty-bitty-details of sexual intercourse. However, he has already asked the Wife and me "where do babies come from?" Giving him some facts about the science of the issue is not a bad thing.
I also think that people should read - in depth - the full article at ABC News. Obama makes his point clear:
Nobody's suggesting that kindergartners are going to be getting information about sex in the way that we think about it. If they ask a teacher 'where do babies come from,' that providing information that the fact is that it's not a stork is probably not an unhealthy thing. Although again, that's going to be determined on a case by case basis by local communities and local school boards.
Wow, he almost sounds like a Libertarian with the 'ocal communities and school boards comment. Nice.

People who are so adamantly against groups like Planned Parenthood should just relax. Obama is NOT suggesting that we should be handing condoms out to pre-schoolers.

Duh.

------
Photo: Jim Mone/AP

18 July 2007

Johnny Mac


- M. Wuerker: Wuerking Drawings

Poor guy. You have to start feeling bad for McCain at some point, right? I mean, he was the presumptive Republican presidential nominee one year ago...

Status Kuo


Man oh man... Kuo certainly gets it. In yesterday's New York Times, David Brooks wrote a column regarding his interview with the president (you have to be a subscriber to view it).

After reading the column - here's what Kuo had to say:
"I believe a gift of that Almighty to all is freedom," Bush said. How completely correct and how outrageously wrong he is. God does give us freedom. But that gift of freedom is not a freedom based on a form of government - it is the freedom to live as individuals with total, complete, and utter free will. It is the freedom to choose or to reject God, the freedom to choose or to reject God's gifts. THAT is God's gift of freedom. To confuse that gift with a form of government reflects both theological and political naivety.
Great thoughts.

This is why I feel that Bush is an idiot: He feels that God has charged him with bringing 'God's gifts' to all of the world.


------
Photo: Brooks Craft/Corbis for Time Magazine

Rupert's World

It won't be long before Rupert Murdoch owns the universe.

Next up; the Dow Jones.

Slumber Party: The Morning After

Oh well.

The Democrats only needed eight more votes to override the Republican filibuster.

Joe Lieberman may as well change his party affiliation. Like I've said before, somebody check his papers.

Are You Sure?

No sh*t Sherlock.

There are many who have been saying this for years. Hence, Osama bin Laden is still at large.

Ugh.

MRAP To The Rescue

Hopefully.

You see, the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle (or MRAP) is better suited to do the job in both Iraq and Afghanistan than the more vulnerable Humvees.

I'm pleased that Defense Secretary Gates is tackling this issue. I only wish that former SecDef Rumsfeld would have stepped up to the plate. There's no telling how many American soldiers would still be alive if he had...

------
Photo: AP

Queen Elizabeth


Meow!

Elizabeth Edwards may appear to be the sweetheart spouse of presidential hopeful John Edwards - but she can put the proverbial smack down with the best of them.

Money quote:
[Hillary Clinton] wants to be commander in chief. But she's just not as vocal a women's advocate as I want to see. John is. And then she says, or maybe her supporters say, "Support me because I'm a woman," and I want to say to her, "Well, then support me because I'm a woman." The question is not so much how she campaigns -- that's theater. The question is, what does her campaign tell you about how she'll govern? And I'm not convinced she'd be as good an advocate for women. She needs a rationale greater for her campaign than I've heard. When she announced her candidacy she said, "I'm in it to win it." What is that? That's not a rationale.
Zing.

------
Photo: Joshua Lott/New York Times

None Of The Above

According to a new AP/Ipsos Poll, Republican voters don't want any of the candidates currently running for president in 2008. Here are the numbers:
Rudy Giuliani :: 21%
Fred Thompson :: 19%
John McCain :: 15%
Mitt Romney :: 11%
None Of The Above :: 23%
That's not very good news if you are the GOP leadership...

Slumber Party


Yay! A sleepover!

Yes, that picture is indeed from the Capitol last evening where Harry Reid and the Democratic leadership forced Senators to stay up all night to have a debate on the war in Iraq.

The only problem is - nothing has really happened because of it. The only positive effect that I see is the incessant media coverage of the all-nighter. At least people are seriously talking about debate again.

Money quotes:
The amendment will look just as bad at 3 a.m. as it does at 3 p.m. The Democrats' all-night debate is nothing more than a publicity stunt -- as Democrats have freely admitted. - Senator Jon Kyl (R-Az)
Equal time:
We're going to continue working on this until we get a vote on this amendment. It's unfortunate that President Bush has proven, beyond any doubt, that he won't listen to the Congress or the American people unless he's forced to, and that's what this amendment does. - Senator Harry Reid (D-Nv), Senate Majority Leader
Can't we all just get along?

Seriously. End this war.

------
Photo: Melina Mara/WP

17 July 2007

Mo' Vitter Blues Redux


Okay gang, I'm not going to harp on this subject - but I do have something more to say about David Vitter (R-La). Before I get into this I must say that I truly do feel badly for Vitter's family. I can only imagine what it must be like to have negative media coverage - and reporters constantly following you around. That said...

I was watching Morning Joe on MSNBC this morning and Joe Scarborough was defending Vitter...errr, somewhat anyway.

Basically, Scarborough was saying that just because Vitter allegedly had seen a prostitute, that didn't make him a bad person (as it turns out, Joe actually knows David Vitter as they both served in the House at the same time). Joe's logic was that we are all hypocritical now and then - and that we all "fall short of the glory of God" (yeah, he actually said that).

While I do see Scarborough's point - and agree with him - this scandal goes beyond simple hypocrisy.

David Vitter is a conservative. BUT, he's not a "live & let live" conservative (like some others out there). Vitter campaigned for his seat in the Senate on 'family values'. He campaigned for his seat in the House of Representatives on 'family values'. He was and IS a 'family values' politician.

So, when a 'family values' politician like Vitter appears to have strayed from said values - that not only makes him a hypocrite - it makes him a liar and someone who owes all of those that he attacked a very public apology.
This is a real outrage. The Hollywood left is redefining the most basic institution in human history, and our two U.S. Senators won’t do anything about it.

We need a U.S. Senator who will stand up for Louisiana values, not Massachusetts’s values. I am the only Senate Candidate to coauthor the Federal Marriage Amendment; the only one fighting for its passage. I am the only candidate proposing changes to the senate rules to stop liberal obstructionists from preventing an up or down vote on issues like this, judges, energy, and on and on.
So, in that one quote - which I pulled straight from his 2004 campaign website - whom did Vitter offend? People in Hollywood. Homosexuals. Residents of Massachusetts. And, I guess, 'liberal obstructionsists'... whomever they are.
NOTE:: By the way - if you want to see more Vitter, check out his campaign media page. Act fast, I don't know how long it's going to be up.

Anyway, the bottom line is this folks: Vitter is a hypocrite. Sure, we all make mistakes in our lives - both sexually and non-sexually (I prefer the latter). However, when someone bases their career in politics on living a 'wholesome', 'family values' lifestyle - and then turns out to be contradicting themselves - they should be called on it. And, they should be held accountable by their constituency.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and guess that Vitter will likely LOSE his re-election bid in 2010 - if he does indeed run for re-election.

That's the last you'll see me write of David B. Vitter, Republican from Louisiana.


------
Photo: Bill Haber/AP

Pornoromney



Really Mitt? You want to rid the nation's computers of pornography? You want to see less sex & violence on TV and in the movies?

Well, as Jerry Seinfeld once said, "Good luck with all that."

Here's a good thought:
Politics cannot solve these issues. It is ridiculous to even be discussing them. There isn't any bill that is going to get parents to turn off computers and there shouldn't be any such bill even if it would work. This is not the work of government. It is the work of families, it is the work of houses of worship - it is the stuff of faith.

But more than any of these matters what an ad like this suggests is that a vote for Mitt Romney is a vote for an America where heaven and earth are a bit closer together.

An ad like this seduces Christian voters in particular into thinking that to vote for Romney is usher in the kind of America that is kinder and calmer and cleaner than the one that currently exists. But that is a cheap out. That isn't ever going to happen through politics. It will only happen through faith - through the tough, hard, every day work of faith...loving neighbors, being self sacrificial, living as Jesus taught his followers to live.

Yes. I'd even give that one an 'AMEN!'.

This is what I've been screaming about ever since I started to get politically minded - way back when I was a big listener of the Howard Stern Show. Stern and his band of misfits were simply getting pummeled by the FCC. Fine after fine - and the only apparent reason for the fines were complaints from right-wing outfits designed to push a religious agenda, and censor anything that was deemed 'indecent'.

Mr. Romney feels that porn and violent video games are the reason that our country is effed-up. Well, I have news for you Mitt: 1) you can't blame those things (TV, movies, the Internets) - you have to blame the PARENTS and 2) our country is pretty great, if you can get past the Iraq stuff and the policies of torture and nation building and..........

But I digress...

Mr. Romney, taking those 'negative' images off of kids' computers and TV screens will not restore the nation to the age of the Beaver. [wow, that sentence sounds a lot worse out loud] REAL parenting will do the trick. Instead of trying to take things away from people - as others in your party would do - I think that you should try giving people help. Help teach that young parent what NOT to let their child watch or listen to - but don't mandate it by making it a law.

That's just f**ked-up.

Head Nod: David Kuo

Plug It In, Plug It In

Sign me up. I'd much rather pay a higher electric bill than shell out $3.00+ per gallon at Sheetz.

I'll admit it - when hybrid cars first hit the market, I was not interested. Oh sure, I wanted to save a few bucks at the gas pump, but I was afraid that the hybrids would not produce enough "uumph" when I wanted to go fast.

I have been proven dead WRONG.

Now, General Motors is working on a two electric vehicles. First up: the Saturn Vue "Green Line". Although it's not going to be ready for the public until 2010, it will be a "plug-in" hybrid - running up to 10 miles on the battery alone. After the battery power is used, the gasoline engine kicks in to run the car AND recharge the battery.

The second - and more exciting option in my opinion - is the Chevrolet Volt. The Volt would also be a plug-in vehicle with an all-electric motor. While there would be a small internal-combustion engine on board, it would only serve to recharge the batteries when away from an electric power source. The Volt would be able to travel 40 miles on a single battery charge.

Sweet. GM goin' green. It's about friggin' time that a major American auto-maker got serious about plug-in technology.

------
Photo: General Motors

The Bullsh*t Roundup, Part Four

Witness hatred at it's finest.

What is wrong with people like this Kevin McCullough? Seriously. This guy must be missing some vital part of his brain - you know, the part that develops compassion.

I've talked about this joker McCullough before - when he talked a bunch of yang about dads who don't work a traditional job:
God intended a father to perform two primary functions in his responsibilities for his family: provision and protection.
Rrrright.

SO, you would think that I would not be surprised when this Bible waving, self-proclaimed-MuscleHead Revolutionary goes on a uber-offensive gay-bashing tirade. But I have to tell you, this guy never ceases to surprise me. In a recent post, McCullough references the impending Democratic Presidential debate, to be hosted on Logo Television - a network that is "
entertainment programming for lesbians and gays and just about anyone who enjoys a gay point of view" (Logo online). Apparently, in the eyes of "MuscleMan", the Logo Network doesn't stand up to the journalistic integrity of the Fox News Channel. Ugh.
One of the lowest rated cable outlets in existence LOGO serves exclusively the communities of people who identify themselves by the type of perverse sexual activity they engage in. "Man/boy lovers", "butch/girly girl amores", "I like to go both ways," and the "I look like a girl but am I" crowds all make their way to LOGO-TV for some daily affirmations where they are told repeatedly, "do whatever you can imagine, and ignore the prudes who say otherwise."
Um. Yeah.

I should mention that he is the one who added all of the labels ("man/boy lovers", "butch/girly girl amores", etc.) to the network. What's that you say? You want more examples? Fine. In reference to Democratic candidates seeking faith-based voters (Evangelicals and the like), while simultaneously seeking the "gay vote", MuscleMan had this to say:
Homosexual behavior and Christianity do not mix. From the standpoint of theory, theology, doctrine, and practice the two are totally and completely incompatible; as are adultery, pornography, bestiality, pedophilia, pre-marital sex, incest, cross dressing, multiple partner orgies and the list goes on. So the candidates can not have it both ways.
Man. Can he hear himself think? Does he actually read what he writes?

Let me see if I understand this: McCullough is equating a homosexual relationship with adultery, porn, bestiality... COME ON! BESTIALITY?

... and what the hell is wrong with porn?!

I'm not wasting any more time on this clown today. I've got more important matters about which I'd like to opine.

Hard Wuerk


- M. Wuerker: Wuerking Drawings

16 July 2007

What's Up Doc?


So, I've talked about Dr. James Holsinger before. He's George W. Bush's nominee for Surgeon General. You remember, he's the guy who has written that homosexual sex is unnatural, as well as some other questionable things.
Now, I said early on that I didn't like this cat - and I disliked him even more because W. was nominating him (what can I say? In my opinion, Bush taints everything he touches). HOWEVER, a couple of things caught my attention:
The nominee also expressed views on several health issues that contradict positions taken by the Bush administration. Holsinger said that abstinence education should be only one part of sexual education for teenagers; that consumer advertising of prescription drugs should be banned; and that he was open to restricting junk food ads that target children and limiting the sale of junk food in schools.
AND...
Holsinger vowed he would step down from his post if he experienced inappropriate political pressure and that he would first try to arrive at a consensus on the issue at hand. But he added: “Quite candidly, if I were unable to do that and I was being overridden, if necessary I would resign.”
Well, that's definitely some good news.

I'm not going to give Holsinger my stamp of approval just yet - but if he lives up to what he's saying, then I may consider it.


------
Photo: Patti Longmire/AP

Wax On, Wax Off


Waxman to Rumsfeld: "Testify."

I'd love to see Rummy in the hot-seat before Congress. It would be fabulous if he came clean on any number of issues - since he's no longer a member of the Bush administration.

A boy can dream, can't he?

------
Photo: NBC News

Caught In The Webb

So, I was watching my weekly does of Meet The Press yesterday morning when I saw this great exchange between senators Jim Webb (D-Va) and Lindsey Graham (R-Sc):

Simply awesome.

The Democrats need to "sack-up" and follow Webb's lead. Period.

When it comes to issues like the war in Iraq, there should be no tip-toeing around the Republicans. The last time that I checked, the Democratic party was still the modern anti-war party. So ACT LIKE IT. ACT LIKE JIM WEBB.

Webb's money quote:
All of the things that people like myself were predicting would happen if we went into Iraq are exactly the sort of things that the president and the small group of people who have sort of rallied around him are saying will happen if we leave. We were saying that Iran would be empowered. We were saying that international terrorism would be empowered. We were saying the reputation of the United States would be diminished around the world and we were saying the region would become more unstable.
Indeed.

There is absolutely NO GOOD REASON why the Democrats (and the anti-war Republicans) do not stand up to the president on this issue. There is too much political posturing going on - we need RESULTS. Out TROOPS need RESULTS. Our representatives in Washington, D.C. need to stop worrying about the special interests who finance their campaigns, and do what it right. End. This. War.

Okay, I'm stepping off of my soapbox for today.

Gilmore Out

Jim Gilmore has officially called it quits.

Wait, who was he again?

Oh, right. He was the Republican candidate who kept repeating his mantra during the debates: "I'm the only candidate who is a true conservative." He also tried to invoke the name of Ronald Reagan every chance that he could.

Right. So, how did that work out for you Jimmy?

Just to give you an idea of how bad it is for this guy, Rudy Giuliani has reported $18.3 million in cash-on-hand - Gilmore has reported roughly $90,000. Yikes.

Good luck in your future endeavors Mr. Gilmore.

Off The Cheney, Again


Ugh. Here we go again.

I swear, these guys just love them some war, don't they?

Here's the real deal though: If Bush and Cheney really want to start a ruckus in Iran, they are going to have a tough go of it from their own people: Americans.

Now that we are in our fifth year of the war in Iraq - and finishing our sixth year of the amorphous "war on terror" - Americans are not going to sanction yet another war. Oh sure, Bush & Co. will invoke the idea that "Iraq and Iran are the central fronts in the war on terrorism" or that "Iran has been helping the insurgents kill our troops". Blah blah blah. We've heard it all before.

I think that if these yahoos in the Bush administration don't start to listen to the will of the citizenry, they will be overwhelmed at the response they get - both from the Congress, and from the American people.

I have to give Condi Rice credit for standing up to the mecha-cyborg that is the vice-president. It has to be simply terrifying to be in the same room with the man. She likely lives in constant fear of a shotgun blast to the face. However, despite her seeming success at keeping Trigger-Happy Dick in line, it sounds like Condi is going to be forced to kick it up-a-notch.

I am hoping against hope that the report in the Guardian is wrong - I really don't want to see MORE troops dying for no good reason.

Be wary of the Cheney...

------
Photo: Ron Edmunds/AP

14 July 2007

One Nation, Under God(s)

Leave it to a trinity of fundamentalist Christians to ruin an historic moment in the U.S. Senate.

Rajan Zed - a priest at a Hindu temple in Reno, Nevada - gave the opening prayer that begins each day at the Senate on Thursday. This was the first time in United States' history that a Hindi gave the opening meditation.

As Zed began his remarks, three protesters began to shout, "No lord but Jesus Christ" and "There's only one true god". Fortunately, all three were arrested and charged with disrupting Congress.

Money quote:

Barry Lynn, executive director of religious watchdog group Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said the protest showed the intolerance of the "religious right."

"I don't think the Senate should open with prayers, but if it's going to happen, the invocations ought to reflect the diversity of the American people," Lynn said in a statement.

Indeed.

It's simply unfortunate that these fanatics who believe in Jesus Christ - a man who preached love and tolerance above all else - give other Christians a bad name. Seriously, there are times when I hear a regular Christian person speak about their religion and think to myself, "Hmm. I wonder if they are a right-wing-nut-job?"

The way that I see this issue is that in our country, people are free to worship (or not worship) as they choose. If the Senate - or any other government body - is going to open each day with a prayer or meditation, then a diverse group of faiths and beliefs should be included. However, I think the best way to deal with this issue is to do what the Constitution says - separate church and State.

Call me 'old fashioned'...

Oh, and if you want some fair & balanced reporting on this story, check this out.

Ugh.

Clinton/Edwards 2008?

People are talking. Talking about this exchange. Speculation to follow...

13 July 2007

Get Osama Already


Seriously gang - it's been SIX FRIGGIN' YEARS... and we still don't have this guy.

$25 million price on Osama bin Laden's head not enough? Fine. Let's raise it to $50 million.

The Senate vote - 87 to 1 in favor of the amendment.

Jim Bunning (R-Ky) was the ONLY senator to vote AGAINST raising the bounty on Osama bin Laden.

THE ONLY ONE.
Reason:
Catching Osama bin Laden and other leaders of al Qaeda is something the United States government has already made a top priority. If Senator Dorgan truly supported our efforts to fight al Qaeda he would not support withdrawing from Iraq, a key battleground against al Qaeda and in the War on Terror.
And that has what to do with the subject at hand? In fact, if we had focused ALL of our resources on capturing ObL in the first place - Iraq would not even be an issue.

------
Photo: Bloomberg News

To Whom Did You Take An Oath?

Sara Taylor, the former White House Political Diretor, getting her ass handed to her by senator Pat Leahy (D-Vt). Observe:

She was drinking guzzling the administration Kool-Aid.

Shady Dems


In the recent past, I have talked about why I will never vote for Hillary Clinton. Yesterday, I praised John Edwards for his work with raising awareness of poverty in America.

Time for a collective Clinton/Edwards SMACKDOWN.

At the debate sponsored by the NAACP yesterday, Hillary Clinton and John Edwards were talking privately in front of an open microphone. Money quote:

After the forum, Fox News microphones picked up Clinton and Edwards discussing their desire to limit future joint appearances to exclude some rivals lower in the crowded field. "We should try to have a more serious and a smaller group," Edwards said.

Clinton agreed. "We've got to cut the number. ... They're not serious," she said, then thanked Obama and Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich as they walked by. Turning back to Edwards, she added that she thought their campaigns had already tried to limit the debates and "we've gotta get back to it." - AP

Video here.

Unbelievable. So much for the democratic process taking place. Seriously, I understand that each of these candidates wants to win. From the biggeeez like Barack and Hillary - down to the UBER-underdogs like Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel - these cats will say and do just about anything to get voters' attention. But the great thing about the primary process is that each party can whittle down the competition through things like debates. Hillary and Edwards are essentially saying that they are the ONLY two viable candidates.

Oh, is that why Edwards is trailing Obama and Hillary's camp is worried about Obama?

Ugh.

I never liked Hillary to begin with, and Edwards just lost a ton of points in my book. Meanwhile, the simple fact that Barack Obama doesn't mind being seen with candidates like Dennis Kucinich speaks volumes about Obama's character.

------
Photo: Carlos Osorio/AP

iPhone Home

And Another K.O. Punch

Gut check.

Can you feel the love?

Friday The 13th


Have a great Friday...

12 July 2007

True Conservation

I'm overwhelmed. I knew that the "war effort" was different in the World War II era, but I had no idea that it was like this.

Shouldn't we be doing these types of things NOW?

Money quote:
The most famous symbol of this wartime conservation ethos was the victory garden. Originally promoted by the Wilson administration to combat the food shortages of World War I, household and communal kitchen gardens had been revived by the early New Deal as a subsistence strategy for the unemployed. After Pearl Harbor, a groundswell of popular enthusiasm swept aside the skepticism of some Department of Agriculture officials and made the victory garden the centerpiece of the national "Food Fights for Freedom" campaign.

By 1943, beans and carrots were growing on the former White House lawn, and First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt and nearly 20 million other victory gardeners were producing 30 to 40 percent of the nation's vegetables--freeing the nation's farmers, in turn, to help feed Britain and Russia. In The Garden Is Political, a 1942 volume of popular verse, poet John Malcolm Brinnin acclaimed these "acres of internationalism" taking root in U.S. cities. Although suburban and rural gardens were larger and usually more productive, some of the most dedicated gardeners were inner-city children. With the participation of the Boy Scouts, trade unions, and settlement houses, thousands of ugly, trash-strewn vacant lots in major industrial cities were turned into neighborhood gardens that gave tenement kids the pride of being self-sufficient urban farmers. In Chicago, 400,000 schoolchildren enlisted in the "Clean Up for Victory" campaign, which salvaged scrap for industry and cleared lots for gardens.

It seems to me that when people - on BOTH sides of the proverbial aisle - talk about supporting the troops, and then drive away in a mammoth SUV that guzzles fossil fuels, isn't that being a bit hypocritical? After September 11, 2001, when president Bush told Americans to continue to go about our lives normally, I think he did the military - and our country in general - a great disservice. Americans SHOULD be sacrificing more than the lives of our men and women in uniform.

We should be planting victory gardens. We should be carpooling. We should be recycling anything and everything that we can. We should be trading in those obnoxious SUVs for smaller more fuel-efficient vehicles - or better yet riding a bike.

If you hate Al Gore and hated An Inconvenient Truth even more then don't think of doing these things as saving Mother Earth. Think of it as saving the life of a person who is stationed in Afghanistan or Iraq.

Hell - just take a moment and THINK.

Head Nod: Andrew Sullivan

Two-Step-Fred


Fred Thompson: Flip-flopper?

------
Photo: Steve Helber/AP

Important News

The top headline on the Drudge Report:

CBS News Chief: Couric Staying Anchored

Oh yeah - and there's a couple of wars going on too.

Inside His Head


"Hey man, I sure do love the new digs here in the Press Room. Did I tie my shoes this morning?"

------
Photo: Larry Downing/REUTERS

Rudy's Dilemma

I'm not sure if Rudy will be able to recover from something like this:

He claims that it's no big deal. However, Americans are now starting to get a different picture of "America's Mayor" on that awful day.

Doctor Under The Influence

Rrrrrright.

Because it went so well for the previous Surgeon General.

What The F**k?

Scary.

In today's episode of What The F**K?, we find that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) set up a phony company to see if it could bypass security measures and purchase radioactive materials.

Money quote:

The undercover operation involved an application from a fake construction company, supposedly based in West Virginia, that the investigators had incorporated even though it had no offices, Internet site or employees. Its only asset was a postal box.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) officials did not visit the company or try to interview its executives in person. Instead, within 28 days, they mailed the license to the West Virginia postal box, the report says.

So basically, any ol' terrorist could purchase a PO box (in my neighborhood, that costs about $5.00 per year) and have some radioactive nastiness shipped to it.

I certainly hope that someone from the NRC gets canned over this report.

Homeland Insecurity


Yesterday, I posted about Homeland Security head Michael Chertoff talking about his guts.

Now he seems to be downplaying the situation. Money quote:
We don't have any specific information about an imminent or near-term attack on the homeland. We're looking at the strategic picture over the next six months to a year. We're evaluating where that is.
Right. So, you are sending everyone into panic-mode for what reason then?

------
Photo: Molly Riley/REUTERS

Poor Tour '07


I agree with David Kuo.

Look, John Edwards has caught a lot of crap because of his expensive tastes in vanity. And maybe he deserves it.

Okay.

Yes, John Edwards is a wealthy man. Yes, John Edwards has built his campaign on the idea of the "two Americas" (one wealthy, one poor). Does it seem somewhat contradictory that a very rich dude is championing the cause of those in financial need? Maybe. But, there is one thing that everyone (sans Kuo) seems to be overlooking: Edwards is putting his money where his mouth is... almost literally.

Much to his credit, Edwards is bringing the national media's attention to his cause - combating poverty - and is forcing Americans to hear what he has to say. Maybe you first clicked on that link about John Edwards because you wanted to read about his "$400 haircut". But you kept reading, and found out about the millions of Americans who live below the poverty line.

So now, the former senator from North Carolina is taking a three-day-break from his campaign (an eternity in campaign terms) to embark on his "Road To One America Tour".
Whether you like Edwards or not, you must agree that he is the only candidate who is doing something like this. As Kuo said:

Predictably, the chatter has been about how this will impact the race. Will it help him get votes? Will it raise his profile? Why is he doing this? Is it genuine? Is he a hypocrite because of his wealth?

Who cares? It does not matter. It doesn't matter if he gets a hair weave on the plane and if he decides to but a new Jaguar. What matters - what matters A LOT - is that he is doing it.

Indeed.


------
Photo: Amanda McCoy/Getty Images

Suggested Reading

Senator Lamar Alexander (R-Tn) to President Bush: Go read a book.

Money quote:

We need to get out of the combat business and into the support business. We've got to get the Iraq Study Group report off the shelf and use it for something other than a bookend.
Support. Indeed. You know, getting our troops supplies and equipment they need - like armored vehicles equipped for withstanding roadside IEDs for example...

Hard Weurk

A big tent indeed.

- M.Weurker: Weurking Drawings

11 July 2007

WHAT?!?!?!

I cannot believe it.
Senate Republicans on Wednesday blocked a proposal to give American troops in Iraq more rest from battle, as Democrats renewed their attempts to change President George W. Bush's Iraq policy.

Seven Republicans joined 48 Democrats and one independent to vote for a plan by Virginia Sen. James Webb to insure that U.S. troops, many of whom have endured multiple deployments to Iraq, get adequate time at home between tours of duty.

But that was still four votes short of the 60 needed on the motion, a procedural hurdle erected by Republicans.

Do I really need to re-hash the story about the guy who's being called out for his FIFTH tour? We need to give our fighting men & women a break.

C'mon Republicans! Wake UP!

They Don't Mess Around In China


Wow. Zheng Xiaoyu, the former head of the Chinese equivalent of the Food & Drug Administration, was executed for - amongst other corruption charges - "approving fake medicine in exchange for cash".

The Chinese don't fool around when it comes to corruption in product safety. And for good reason - the Beijing Olympics are coming next summer.

I'm not in favor of the death penalty, but, maybe we should start executing corrupt government officials. At least the prospect of death would keep people honest...

Corporate Overlords

Store

Masthead

Voices:
Elsewhere:
  • The Pajama Pundit's featured article at Blogs.com.
  • The Pajama Pundit's contributions at Donklephant.

previous mastheads | site credits | contact | advertising | legal