Witness hatred at it's finest.
What is wrong with people like this Kevin McCullough? Seriously. This guy must be missing some vital part of his brain - you know, the part that develops compassion.
I've talked about this joker McCullough before - when he talked a bunch of yang about dads who don't work a traditional job:God intended a father to perform two primary functions in his responsibilities for his family: provision and protection.
Rrrright.
SO, you would think that I would not be surprised when this Bible waving, self-proclaimed-MuscleHead Revolutionary goes on a uber-offensive gay-bashing tirade. But I have to tell you, this guy never ceases to surprise me. In a recent post, McCullough references the impending Democratic Presidential debate, to be hosted on Logo Television - a network that is "entertainment programming for lesbians and gays and just about anyone who enjoys a gay point of view" (Logo online). Apparently, in the eyes of "MuscleMan", the Logo Network doesn't stand up to the journalistic integrity of the Fox News Channel. Ugh.One of the lowest rated cable outlets in existence LOGO serves exclusively the communities of people who identify themselves by the type of perverse sexual activity they engage in. "Man/boy lovers", "butch/girly girl amores", "I like to go both ways," and the "I look like a girl but am I" crowds all make their way to LOGO-TV for some daily affirmations where they are told repeatedly, "do whatever you can imagine, and ignore the prudes who say otherwise."
Um. Yeah.
I should mention that he is the one who added all of the labels ("man/boy lovers", "butch/girly girl amores", etc.) to the network. What's that you say? You want more examples? Fine. In reference to Democratic candidates seeking faith-based voters (Evangelicals and the like), while simultaneously seeking the "gay vote", MuscleMan had this to say:Homosexual behavior and Christianity do not mix. From the standpoint of theory, theology, doctrine, and practice the two are totally and completely incompatible; as are adultery, pornography, bestiality, pedophilia, pre-marital sex, incest, cross dressing, multiple partner orgies and the list goes on. So the candidates can not have it both ways.
Man. Can he hear himself think? Does he actually read what he writes?
Let me see if I understand this: McCullough is equating a homosexual relationship with adultery, porn, bestiality... COME ON! BESTIALITY?
... and what the hell is wrong with porn?!
I'm not wasting any more time on this clown today. I've got more important matters about which I'd like to opine.
Bert McBrayer - Founder/Editor
0 comments:
Post a Comment